Training Lawyers for Ethical AI Integration: What Most Articles Miss

Aug 15, 2023


There’s no doubt that artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly revolutionizing the legal sector. From streamlining tasks like contract comparison to rephrasing intricate regulations for clarity, the potential applications of AI are vast and promising. Miriam Rozen’s piece on July 5, 2023, in the Financial Times titled “Generative AI Pioneers Line Up on Legal Tech,” provides a comprehensive snapshot of this transformative journey.

In her article, Rozen highlights the burgeoning interest and investment in generative AI technology within the legal tech sphere. Major players, ranging from the Big Four professional services firms to established information providers like LexisNexis and Thomson Reuters, are racing to harness the power of generative AI. The primary drive? To optimize and transform various facets of the legal services sector. This wave of innovation is marked by strategic partnerships and initiatives geared towards creating AI platforms capable of accomplishing numerous lawyerly tasks within seconds.

However, there’s a glaring gap in the narrative, not just in Rozen’s article but across the industry discourse: the training and ethical considerations that lawyers must confront as they integrate these advanced tools into their practice.

background blank business craft
Photo by Pixabay on

AI: A Tool, Not a Replacement

First and foremost, while AI tools can indeed enhance efficiency and streamline various processes, they don’t replace the judgment, ethics, and nuanced understanding that human lawyers bring to their profession. Tools, no matter how advanced, require appropriate training and an ethical framework to ensure their proper use.

Training: Bridging the Gap Between Technology and Ethics

The legal sector requires a robust training infrastructure that goes beyond mere technical know-how. Lawyers don’t just need to understand how AI works; they need to know:

  • When it’s appropriate to use AI and when human judgment is paramount.
  • How to recognize the biases inherent in AI algorithms and address them.
  • Ethical implications of relying heavily on machine-generated insights, especially when representing clients.

Miriam Rozen’s article emphasizes regulatory debates about the role of AI, which, while important, only skim the surface of the broader training and ethical landscape. A solid training framework is critical for guiding lawyers on how and when to use AI tools effectively, ensuring they remain in line with industry ethics and standards.

The Case for a Comprehensive Training Module

A holistic AI training module for lawyers should encompass:

  1. Technical Acquaintance: Understanding the basics of AI, its potential, limitations, and inherent biases.
  2. Ethical Guidelines: A deep dive into the moral and professional considerations when using AI, ensuring that lawyers maintain their duty of care to clients.
  3. Practical Scenarios: Simulated real-life situations where lawyers can practice using AI tools, decide when to rely on them, and when to trust their judgment.


The future of law, as painted by Rozen and many others, undoubtedly features a significant role in AI. However, the narrative must evolve beyond showcasing tools and delve into the necessary infrastructure to train lawyers on their appropriate and ethical use. Only then can we truly unlock the potential of AI in the legal sector without compromising the values and ethics that are the cornerstone of the profession.

Original article: Rozen, M. (July, 5 2023). Generative AI pioneers line up on legal tech. Financial Times. Retrieved from: